Legal Opinion

Saroff v. Haun

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided January 5, 2001No. 85,457PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Malone, J.:

Deborah Saroff, f/k/a Deborah Haun, appeals the district court’s ruling allowing her ex-husband, Rudy Haun, to terminate his maintenance obligation on the date of Saroffs remarriage and to prorate that month’s payment accordingly. The issue is whether a maintenance obligation, which is due on the first day of the month, can or should be prorated to the date that a remarriage occurs during the month. This is an issue of first impression in Kansas.

The facts are undisputed. The Hauns were divorced on November 1, 1994. They entered into a settlement agreement that was approved by the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Dodd v. DoddSupreme Court of Kansas · 1972
  2. Kendall v. KendallSupreme Court of Kansas · 1976
  3. Elliott v. Farm Bureau Ins. Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1999
  4. In re the Marriage of PfeiferSupreme Court of Kansas · 1995

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re the Marriage of EvansCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API