Legal Opinion
In Re Tax Appeal of Karsten
Court of Appeals of Kansas
Decided October 4, 1996No. 74,692, 74,694, 74,695, 74,696, 74,697PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Lyle, J.:
This appeal, a consolidation of five tax appeals, was taken by the Riley County Board of County Commissioners after the district court affirmed the decisions of the Board of Tax Appeals (BOTA). BOTA found Chris L. and Laurine A. Karsten, et al., (applicants) were exempt from payment of ad valorem property taxes on their automobiles under the Soldiers’ and Sailors’ Civil Relief Act of 1940.
All of the applicants are United States Army personnel or their spouses stationed at Fort Riley. In 1993, the applicants were assessed ad valorem taxes on the automobiles they maintained while…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Hines v. DavidowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Jones v. Rath Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Le Maistre v. LeffersSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- California v. BuzardSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Sunflower Racing, Inc. v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1994
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State ex rel. Kline v. Transmasters TowingCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2007
- United States v. MinnesotaDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2000
- Palandech v. Department of Revenue, Tc-Md 100015c (or.tax 3-23-2011)Oregon Tax Court · 2011