Legal Opinion

Bolten v. The James L. Pendergast

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided March 31, 1887PublishedCited by 2 opinions

In Admiralty.

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

The libel in the above cause was filed to recover the sum of §1,592.50, upon a draft drawn and negotiated to the libelant by the master of the James L. Pendergast at Hamburg, May 7, 1880, for £825, payable 30 days after arrival at Boston, Massachusetts, at 1he oilice of the consignees. The last clause of the draft is as follows: “Value received, for the necessary use and outfit for the said vessel, and for the payment of which I hold my vessel, owners, and freight responsible.”

The proofs leave no doubt that the draft was drawn to obtain necessaries for the ship at Hamburg, and in form and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. The ThalesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1869
  2. The ThalesU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1872
  3. The Jack JewettDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1868

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Monsen v. AmsinckDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1908
  2. Berry v. GraceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1894

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API