Legal Opinion

The Thales

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided June 15, 1869PublishedCited by 5 opinions

In admiralty.

1Opinion of the Court

BLATCHFORD, District Judge.

This libel was filed March 4th, 1858, by the firm of B. M. & E. A. Whitlock & Co., against the bark Thales, to recover a sum of money, as the balance remaining due for certain repairs, supplies, and advances claimed to have been furnished at Pensacola, Florida, in the fall of 1856, by the firm of I-ieyser, Judah & Co., commission -merchants there, for the use of the bark, and on her credit. When the suit was brought, the claim belonged to B. M. & E. A. Whitlock & Co., and it has since been assigned to William H. Judah, who has been substituted as libellant.

One of…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. The Haytian RepublicSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. Braithwaite v. JordanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1895
  3. The William F. McRaeDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1885
  4. In re John B. Rose Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1918
  5. Bolten v. The James L. PendergastDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1887

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API