Legal Opinion

Smith v. Semo Tank & Supply Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided December 24, 2002No. ED 81295PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARY M. GAERTNER, Sr., Judge.

Appellants, Semo Tank & Supply Co. (“Semo”) and Missouri Employers Mutual Insurance, appeal from an order of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (“commission”) finding that the alleged settlement between Semo and respondent, Keith Smith (“claimant”) was a nullity and was not in the best interest of the claimant. Based upon this finding the commission remanded the matter for hearing on the merits of the claim. We dismiss.

This cause was presented to the Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) upon the agreed stipulation of facts of the parties. Claimant filed a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Korte v. Fry-Wagner Moving & Storage Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1996
  2. Ayotte v. Pillsbury Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1994
  3. Martin v. Jet Envelope, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1997
  4. Nisbett v. Tri-State Motor TransitMissouri Court of Appeals · 2001

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Ming v. General Motors Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2004
  2. Jackson v. Stahl Specialty Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2010
  3. Williams v. Tyson Foods Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2017
  4. John Fowler v. T.J. Ahrens Excavating, Inc., and Division of Employment SecurityMissouri Court of Appeals · 2014
  5. Ab Elec., Inc. v. FranklinMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API