Legal Opinion

Deaux v. Trinidad Bean & Elevator Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 27, 1935No. Civ. 9791PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILSON, J., pro tem.

This action is upon several assigned claims growing out of similar transactions between respondent’s respective assignors, who were bean growers, and the appellants. The facts are the same in each transaction. The appellant Allard was the agent of the appellant Trinidad Company, hereinafter referred to as the company, and as such presented a plan to the growers whereby they delivered beans to the company in 1930, and received a loan thereon. Storage receipts were issued by the company, headed “Storage Receipt and Agreement”, the pertinent language of which is as follows:…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Perry v. MagnesonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Lowe v. OzmunCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1906
  3. Glantz v. FreedmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  4. Mier v. Southern California Ice Co.California Court of Appeal · 1922
  5. Provident Gold Mining Co. v. Manhattan SEC. Co.California Supreme Court · 1914

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Benson v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. BladeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  3. Katz v. EnosCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
  4. Vogelsang v. WolpertCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  5. Oil Base, Inc. v. Transport Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1957

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API