Legal Opinion
Casarez v. Val Verde County
District Court, W.D. Texas
Decided July 17, 1998No. 2:96-cr-00108PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED ORDER
BIERY, District Judge.
This third episode of the Casarez Trilogy 1 presents plaintiffs request to amend her complaint to join the United States Department of Defense and Secretary of State of Texas as defendants.
The proposed amended complaint amplifies plaintiffs earlier allegations to include charges the Department of Defense and Secretary of State have failed to implement properly the Uniformed and Overseas Citizens Absentee Voting Act, (“UOCAVA”), 42 U.S.C. § 1973ff et seq., resulting in ineligible absent military voters participating in local elections as opposed to casting…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Huffman v. Pursue, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Young v. YoungWashington Supreme Court · 2008
- Young v. YoungWashington Supreme Court · 2008
- Broyles v. TexasDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2009
- Casarez v. Val Verde CountyDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 1998
- Curtis v. SmithDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 2001