Legal Opinion

Rowerdink v. Carothers

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 3, 1952No. Docket 52, Calendar 45,509PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtReid, J.

This is in effect a bill of complaint filed for construction of a deed in which the grantees are “Alfred Carothers and Delarma Hackett, or the survivor of them.” The decree of the trial court determined that plaintiff, the grantee of Hackett who survived Carothers, is the owner of the property. Defendant who claimed through Carothers, appealed.

The receiver of the. Citizens State Bank of Fife Lake on November 13, 1937, petitioned the circuit court for authority to sell the west half of.the southeast one-quarter and the southeast one-quarter' of the southeast one-quarter of sec 36, T 26 N, R 9…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. In re Blodgett's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Schulz v. BrohlMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Finch v. HaynesMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Taylor v. TaylorMichigan Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Ames v. CheyneMichigan Supreme Court · 1939

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Shulansky v. MichaelsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1971
  2. Ballard v. WilsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Johnson v. WoodardMissouri Court of Appeals · 1962
  4. Anderson v. RichterMichigan Court of Appeals · 1974
  5. Bonner v. PughSupreme Court of Alabama · 1979

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API