Legal Opinion
Schulz v. Brohl
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided April 19, 1898PublishedCited by 27 opinions
Appeal from Wayne; McMahon, J., presiding. Bill by Christine Schulz, by Charles Schulz, her guardian, against Joseph Brohl, to quiet title. From a decree dismissing the bill on demurrer, .complainant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.
The bill in this case was filed to quiet title. April 17, 1884, a deed was made by Caroline Schulz, the main provisions of which were as follows:
“This indenture, made this seventeenth day o£ April, in the year of our Lord one thousand eight hundred and eighty-four, between Caroline Schulz, of Detroit, Michigan, party of the first part, and Peter Brohl and Christine Schulz, of Q-rosse Pointe, Wayne county, Michigan, to them and the survivor of them, parties of the second part, Witnesseth:
“That the said party of the first part, for and in consideration of the sum of eleven hundred dollars…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Moran v. LezotteMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
- Munro v. MeechMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
- Ewing's heirs v. SavaryCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1813
3Cited by27 opinions
- Albro v. AllenMichigan Supreme Court · 1990
- Finch v. HaynesMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
- Darryl F. Bryant, Sr. v. Darryl F. Bryant, Jr.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2017
- Arthur v. ArthurNebraska Supreme Court · 1927
- Ames v. CheyneMichigan Supreme Court · 1939
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.