Legal Opinion

Schulz v. Brohl

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 19, 1898PublishedCited by 27 opinions

Appeal from Wayne; McMahon, J., presiding. Bill by Christine Schulz, by Charles Schulz, her guardian, against Joseph Brohl, to quiet title. From a decree dismissing the bill on demurrer, .complainant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.

The bill in this case was filed to quiet title. April 17, 1884, a deed was made by Caroline Schulz, the main provisions of which were as follows:

“This indenture, made this seventeenth day o£ April, in the year of our Lord one thousand eight hundred and eighty-four, between Caroline Schulz, of Detroit, Michigan, party of the first part, and Peter Brohl and Christine Schulz, of Q-rosse Pointe, Wayne county, Michigan, to them and the survivor of them, parties of the second part, Witnesseth:
“That the said party of the first part, for and in consideration of the sum of eleven hundred dollars…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Moran v. LezotteMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Munro v. MeechMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Ewing's heirs v. SavaryCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1813

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Albro v. AllenMichigan Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Finch v. HaynesMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Darryl F. Bryant, Sr. v. Darryl F. Bryant, Jr.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2017
  4. Arthur v. ArthurNebraska Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Ames v. CheyneMichigan Supreme Court · 1939

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API