State v. Henley

SHIRLEY S. ABRAHAMSON, C.J., ANN WALSH BRADLEY, J, and N. PATRICK CROOKS, J.

¶ 41. *629{dissenting). The per curiam correctly observes that Henley's motion for reconsideration is in essence a motion pursuing the disqualification of Justice Patience D. Roggensack. The motion asserts that the court's decision in State v. Henley1 violates the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution because:

(A) Our court has failed to provide any process for judicial review of Justice Roggensack's decision not to recuse herself.2

(B) Justice Patience D. Roggensack has…