Legal Opinion
Best Advertising Corp. v. Illinois Bell Telephone Co.
District Court, S.D. Illinois
Decided April 23, 1964No. Civ. A. No. RI-61PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MERCER, Chief Judge.
Plaintiff, Best Advertising Corp., filed this complaint pursuant to the provisions of Section 4 of the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C. § 15, for treble the amount of damages allegedly sustained by plaintiff as a result of defendants’ alleged violation of Section 1 and 2 of Sherman Antitrust Act. 15 U.S.C. §§ 1, 2. The defendants, Illinois Bell Telephone Company and The Reuben H. Donnelley Corporation, filed their motion to dismiss the complaint upon the ground that the complaint fails to state a cause of action against the defendants or either of them. Hereinafter, for convenience,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. Colgate & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1919
- United States v. South-Eastern Underwriters Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Lorain Journal Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Radovich v. National Football LeagueSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Indiana Farmer's Guide Publishing Co. v. Prairie Farmer Publishing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Ad-Vantage Telephone Directory Consultants, Inc., Cross v. Gte Directories Corporation, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1987
- Tripoli Company v. Wella CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1968
- Ficker v. Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1984
- Paul v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 1971