Legal Opinion
Ficker v. Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Co.
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided October 29, 1984No. Civ. Y-83-4432PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
JOSEPH H. YOUNG, District Judge.
Robin K.A. Ficker, a Maryland attorney, filed this suit against Chesapeake and Potomac Telephone Company (“C & P”) and the Reuben Donnelley Corporation (“Donnelley”) pursuant to Section 4 of the Clayton Act seeking tremble damages, 15 U.S.C. § 15, and injunctive relief, 15 U.S.C. § 26, for alleged violations of Sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1, 2. 1 Defendants now seek dismissal of the plaintiff’s complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted under Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Associated General Contractors of California, Inc. v. California State Council of CarpentersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Standard Oil Company of New Jersey, Appts. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- United States v. Colgate & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Blue Shield of Va. v. McCreadySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Battles v. Anne Arundel County Board of EducationDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1995
- Thompson Everett, Inc. v. National Cable AdvertisingDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1994
- Eston v. Van BoltDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1990