Legal Opinion

Isenburg v. Isenburg

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided December 19, 2017No. AC38669Published

1Opinion of the CourtSheldon, J.

The plaintiff, Elizabeth Isenburg, 1 appeals from the judgment of the trial court, rendered after a trial to the court, awarding her limited damages and other relief against the defendant, Matthew Isenburg, on multiple claims against him. 2 The following facts, as found by the trial court, are relevant to this appeal. The plaintiff and the defendant were in a relationship for fourteen years, from 1998 to 2012. During that period, the plaintiff lived in the defendant's home. Long before the parties' relationship began, the defendant owned an extensive collection of early photographs and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In re Bernice LandrySupreme Court of Vermont · 2015
  2. Augeri v. Planning & Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 1991
  3. Lyme Land Conservation Trust, Inc. v. PlatnerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2017
  4. State v. MilnerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2017
  5. Connecticut Bank & Trust Co. v. Munsill-Borden Mansion, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API