Legal Opinion

Connecticut Bank & Trust Co. v. Munsill-Borden Mansion, LLC

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided December 10, 2013No. AC 34495PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SCHALLER, J.

In this action on a cross complaint to recover amounts due on a promissory note, the defendants, Munsill-Borden Mansion, LLC (Munsill-Borden), and Claude M. Brouillard, appeal from the judgment of the trial court rendered in favor of the cross claim plaintiff, Edward G. Kriedel III.1 On appeal, the defendants claim that the trial court improperly (1) excluded parol evidence and (2) applied certain provisions of the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC), General Statutes *32§ 42a-3-101 et seq. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

The record reveals the following facts and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. SimpsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
  2. Baker v. CordiscoConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995
  3. Lydy v. Trustaff, Inc./Wausau Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Vermont · 2013
  4. State v. FaisonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
  5. State v. FaisonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Bank of New York Mellon v. HorseyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018
  2. A & R Enterprises, LLC v. Sentinel Ins. Co., Ltd.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2021
  3. Hadco Metal Trading Co., LLC v. Barcol-Air, Ltd.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2016
  4. Isenburg v. IsenburgConnecticut Appellate Court · 2017
  5. Lebanon Historical Society, Inc v. Attorney GeneralConnecticut Appellate Court · 2021

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API