Legal Opinion

Pantry, Inc. v. City of Pigeon Forge

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided November 5, 1984PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BROCK, Justice.

The plaintiff applied for a permit to sell beer for off-the-premises consumption in the City of Pigeon Forge, Tennessee, and was denied that permit solely because its proposed location contained only 2,400 sq. ft. of heated, enclosed floor space, whereas, Ordinance No. 281 of the City forbids the issuance of a permit to any applicant whose premises contains less than 3,500 sq. ft. of heated, enclosed floor space. The plaintiff appealed and the Chancery Court held that the requirement of the ordinance that an applicant have 3,500 sq. ft. of heated, enclosed floor space…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. City of Chattanooga v. Tennessee Alcoholic Beverage CommissionTennessee Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Watkins v. NaifehTennessee Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Thompson v. City of HarrimanTennessee Supreme Court · 1978

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Fritts v. WallaceTennessee Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Neece v. City of Johnson CityTennessee Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Beer Board for Goodlettsville v. Brass A Saloon of Rivergate, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Dixon v. Lawrenceburg Beer BoardCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1999
  5. G and N Restaurant Group, Inc. d/b/a City Cafe Diner v. City of ChattanoogaCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API