People v. Brody
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
The defendant contends that he was deprived of the right to confront a witness against him when the prosecutor elicited testimony from a police officer that the officer interviewed a *785nontestifying witness regarding whether she had been with the defendant on the date of the crime. This contention is without merit, since the Supreme Court did not permit any hearsay testimony regarding the statements of the nontestifying witness to the police officer and there was no danger that the jury could infer that the nontestifying witness possessed information which could implicate the defendant (see…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- People v. CrimminsNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- People v. JohnsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- People v. FerminAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- People v. PorcoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- People v. BoyceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- People v. FletcherAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- People v. FlowersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- People v. ArroyoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- People v. DillyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- People v. FranksAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.