Legal Opinion

Aycock-Lindsey Corporation v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided December 23, 1948No. 12353PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALLER, Circuit Judge.

Two questions are involved in this case: (1) whether or not the District Court has jurisdiction under the Tucker Act1 of this action by a naval stores producer to.recover subsidy payments under the Federal Soil Conservation and Domestic Allotment Act on the theory that Appellant’s claim arose under a law of Congress and also under an implied contract which it performed and which entitled it to the payment of a subsidy under the regulations of the Department of Agriculture governing the naval stores production and conservation program of such Department; (2) whether or…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Mayo v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. Dismuke v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  3. Illinois Packing Co. v. SnyderEmergency Court of Appeals · 1945
  4. United States v. LaughlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  5. Heinz v. BowlesEmergency Court of Appeals · 1945

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Patrick Esch v. Clayton K. Yeutter, Secretary, U.S. Department of AgricultureCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1989
  2. Army and Air Force Exchange Service v. SheehanSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Carruth v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1980
  4. Arthur Edward Sheehan v. Army and Air Force Exchange Service, an Instrumentality of the Departments of the Army and of the Air ForceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
  5. New York Airways, Inc. v. The United States. Los Angeles Airways, Inc. v. The United States. Chicago Helicopter Airways, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1966

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API