Aycock-Lindsey Corporation v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
WALLER, Circuit Judge.
Two questions are involved in this case: (1) whether or not the District Court has jurisdiction under the Tucker Act1 of this action by a naval stores producer to.recover subsidy payments under the Federal Soil Conservation and Domestic Allotment Act on the theory that Appellant’s claim arose under a law of Congress and also under an implied contract which it performed and which entitled it to the payment of a subsidy under the regulations of the Department of Agriculture governing the naval stores production and conservation program of such Department; (2) whether or…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Mayo v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Dismuke v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Illinois Packing Co. v. SnyderEmergency Court of Appeals · 1945
- United States v. LaughlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Heinz v. BowlesEmergency Court of Appeals · 1945
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Patrick Esch v. Clayton K. Yeutter, Secretary, U.S. Department of AgricultureCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1989
- Army and Air Force Exchange Service v. SheehanSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Carruth v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1980
- Arthur Edward Sheehan v. Army and Air Force Exchange Service, an Instrumentality of the Departments of the Army and of the Air ForceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- New York Airways, Inc. v. The United States. Los Angeles Airways, Inc. v. The United States. Chicago Helicopter Airways, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1966
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.