Legal Opinion

New York Airways, Inc. v. The United States. Los Angeles Airways, Inc. v. The United States. Chicago Helicopter Airways, Inc. v. The United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided December 16, 1966No. 168-65, 234-65, 343-65PublishedCited by 71 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM: *

These are three parallel suits by three helicopter companies which were not paid sums alleged to be due them from April 1965, for carrying the mail. Plaintiff in No. 168-65, New York Airways, Inc. has continuously operated since 1960 a helicopter service in the New York City metropolitan area under a certificate of public convenience and necessity issued by the Civil Aeronautics Board (the “Board”) pursuant to section 401 of the Federal Aviation Act of 1958 (the “Act”, 49 U.S.C. § 1301 et seq.), authorizing this plaintiff to carry passengers, property, and mail. Under its…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. United States v. DickersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Merritt v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  3. Sutton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  4. United States v. LangstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  5. Ferris v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1892

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by71 opinions

  1. Greenlee County, Arizona v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
  2. Army and Air Force Exchange Service v. SheehanSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Maine Community Health Options v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2020
  4. Cherokee Nation of Okla. v. LeavittSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  5. Carruth v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1980

66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API