Legal Opinion

State v. Matthew O. Brooks

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided September 24, 2014No. 41046PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MELANSON, Judge.

Matthew O. Brooks appeals from his judgment of conviction for possession of a controlled substance. Specifically, Brooks contends that the district court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence, arguing that

his alleged failure to signal for five seconds before changing lanes did not violate the law and thus could not justify the traffic stop. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm.

I

FACTS AND PROCEDURE

Brooks was stopped after an officer observed Brooks change lanes on the interstate without signaling for at least five continuous seconds. 1 The officer understood…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. State v. AtkinsonIdaho Court of Appeals · 1996
  4. State v. Valdez-MolinaIdaho Supreme Court · 1995
  5. State v. ScheversIdaho Court of Appeals · 1999

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. Thomas C. KelleyIdaho Court of Appeals · 2015
  2. State v. DavisIdaho Court of Appeals · 2020
  3. State v. FrandsenIdaho Court of Appeals · 2020
  4. State v. Salas, JrIdaho Court of Appeals · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API