Legal Opinion
State v. Schevers
Idaho Court of Appeals
Decided February 9, 1999No. 24164PublishedCited by 385 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LANSING, Judge.
In this appeal, we are asked to vacate James Allen Schevers’ judgment of conviction for robbery because, it is asserted, the district court should have suppressed testimony regarding a witness’s identification of Schevers as the robber. We affirm.
FACTS
Schevers was charged with committing a robbery at a liquor store. Prior to his trial, he filed a motion seeking to suppress a witness’s in-court identification and her pretrial out-of-court identification of Schevers as the robber.
Evidence presented at the suppression hearing revealed the following facts. On the evening of…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Manson v. BrathwaiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- State v. Valdez-MolinaIdaho Supreme Court · 1995
- United States v. David Thai, Lan Ngoc Tran, Minh Do, Jimmy Nguyen, Hoang Huy Ngo, Quang Van Nguyen, and Lv Hong, A/K/A "l.v. Hong"Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Maldonado-RiveraCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by385 opinions
- State v. RoeIdaho Court of Appeals · 2004
- State v. GibsonIdaho Court of Appeals · 2005
- State v. AverettIdaho Court of Appeals · 2006
- State v. RobinsonIdaho Court of Appeals · 2007
- State v. BallouIdaho Court of Appeals · 2008
380 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.