Legal Opinion

Miller v. California

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 22, 2004No. 02-16780PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RYMER, Circuit Judge.

We must decide two related. questions arising out of a protracted and contentious dependency dispute: whether noncustodial grandparents, acting as de facto parents to grandchildren who are dependents of the juvenile court, have a substantive due process right to family integrity and association with those grandchildren; and whether placing the grandfather’s name on the California Child Abuse Central Index (CACI) violates his constitutional right to due process.

Charles and Patricia Miller are grandparents of three young girls who had been removed from their natural parents…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Paul v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Troxel v. GranvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Lee v. City Of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  4. Moore v. City of East ClevelandSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Wisconsin v. ConstantineauSupreme Court of the United States · 1971

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Humphries v. County of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  2. Davis v. PowellDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2012
  3. Miller v. CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  4. Inman v. AndersonDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2018
  5. James Endy v. County of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API