Aikins v. Kingsbury
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. U. S. Webb, Attorney-General, Malcolm C. Glenn, Deputy Attorney-General, and Robert W. Harrison, Deputy Attorn ney-General, for Appellant.
1Opinion of the CourtMelvin, J.
Petitioner successfully sought a writ of mandate to compel the register of the land office of the state of California to issue a patent to certain school land in Kern County. The judgment was affirmed by the district court of appeal of the first appellate district, but on petition was transferred to this court. There is an appeal also from the order denying the motion for a new trial.
The essential facts are as follows: On June 3, 1869, there was issued to Charles A. B. Brackett a certificate of purchase of the tract of land here in litigation upon the payment of a part of the purchase…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Bank of Columbia v. OkelySupreme Court of the United States · 1819
- People ex rel. McCauley & Tevis v. BrooksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
- Fristoe v. Leon & H. BlumTexas Supreme Court · 1898
- Barnes v. GlideCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Wilson v. StandeferSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- City of Los Angeles v. OliverCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- County of San Bernardino v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
- Secret Valley Land Co. v. PerryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Arques v. National Superior Co.California Court of Appeal · 1945
- Lincoln v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.