Legal Opinion

Rostykus v. Fidelity Finance Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 10, 1950No. 33643PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCorn, J.

Plaintiff brought this action against the Fidelity Finance Company, a corporation, and its surety, Sharp, to recover damages for breach of the terms of a replevin bond executed by defendants. An order was entered sustaining defendants’ demurrer to the amended petition, and plaintiff has appealed. The facts out of which the controversy arose may be summarized as follows:

October 18, 1946, the plaintiff, then a minor, purchased an automobile from one Holden, made down payment thereon, signed notes for the balance due and executed a chattel mortgage on *443the automobile to secure the notes. The…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wilson Motor Co. v. DunnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  2. Rosen v. United States Rubber Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
  3. Jarecki Manufacturing Co. v. FlemingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  4. Carte-Caldwell v. BerryhillSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Brunswick Corporation v. J & P, Inc., an Oklahoma Corporation, Lucille Greer and Jack GreerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1970
  2. Womack v. City of Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1986
  3. SWEETEN v. LAWSONCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2017
  4. Rostykus v. Fidelity Finance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950
  5. SWEETEN v. LAWSONCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API