Legal Opinion

DuHamell v. Industrial Commission

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided May 22, 1973No. 1 CA-IC 716PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAIRE, Judge.

In this review by certiorari, the petitioning widow and dependent children of a deceased workman urge that the Industrial Commission and its hearing officer erred in concluding that the employee’s death did not arise out of and in the course of his employment as an automobile salesman.

The accident resulting in the death occurred at a street intersection in Coolidge, Arizona, when the decedent made a left turn into the path of an oncoming vehicle. At the time of the collision the decedent was driving an automobile furnished by his employer for both personal and business use. It is…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Malinski v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Arnott v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Strauss v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Harrington v. Industrial Commission of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Buick v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1957

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Fisher Contracting Co. v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1976
  2. Hunt Bldg. Corp. v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZ.Arizona Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Brooks v. INDUS. COM'N OF ARIZONACourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
  4. Kriese v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1976
  5. Brooks v. INDUS. COM'N OF ARIZONACourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API