Legal Opinion

Steffes v. California Interscholastic Federation

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 16, 1986No. B011081PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ARABIAN, J.-

Introduction

The principal question in this case of first impression is whether, under the California Constitution, the right to participate in inter scholastic athletics is a “fundamental right.”

Facts

Plaintiff and appellant, Kent Conrad Steffes, a minor, by his Guardian Ad Litem, Jackson T. Steffes (Steffes), appeals from an order of the trial court denying his petition for a preliminary injunction to restrain defendants California Interscholastic Federation; California Interscholastic Federation, Los Angeles City Section; Los Angeles City School District; William Honig, as…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. San Antonio Independent School District v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Exxon Corp. v. Governor of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Serrano v. PriestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Nestle v. City of Santa MonicaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Serrano v. PriestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Hill v. National Collegiate Athletic Assn.California Supreme Court · 1994
  2. California Teachers Ass'n v. Governing Board of Rialto Unified School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Butt v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Ryan v. California Interscholastic Federation-San Diego SectionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
  5. Jones v. California Interscholastic FederationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API