Legal Opinion

Central States Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund v. Hitchings Trucking, Inc.

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided July 20, 1979No. Civ. A. 7-71951PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

JOINER, District Judge.

Counsel suggests that this case involves the actuarial solvency of union pension plans. It involves the question of whether there is an obligation on the part of an employer to continue to pay into a union pension fund in accordance with the terms of a collective bargaining agreement after that agreement has expired and before another agreement is negotiated.

The defendant and Teamsters Local 339 entered into a collective bargaining agreement to be bound by the provisions of a master collective bargaining agreement negotiated between the Labor…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. National Labor Relations Board v. KatzSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Harold W. Hinson, D/B/A Hen House Market No. 3 v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1970
  3. Eisler v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1948

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Laborers Fringe Benefit Funds Detroit and Vicinity v. Northwest Concrete & Construction, Inc. And James M. HaleyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981
  2. Central States Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund v. Hitchings Trucking, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1980
  3. Van Drivers Union Local No. 392 v. Neal Moving & StorageDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1982
  4. CENT. STATES, SOUTHEAST v. McNamara Motor Exp.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1980
  5. Bricklayers & Trowel Trades Int'l Pension Fund v. Kel-Tech Constr., Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API