Legal Opinion
Rosenberg v. D. Kaltman & Co.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided November 12, 1953PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
28 N.J. Super. 459 (1953)
101 A.2d 94
PINCUS ROSENBERG, PLAINTIFF,
v.
D. KALTMAN & CO., INC., DEFENDANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division.
Decided November 12, 1953.
Mr. Isaac C. Ginsburg for plaintiff.
Mr. Milton Rosenkranz for defendant (Messrs. Walscheid & Rosenkranz, attorneys).
HANEMAN, J.S.C.
The complaint herein seeks a declaratory judgment under N.J.S. 2A:16-50 to declare the rights, status and legal relations of the plaintiff in connection with two certain contracts entered into between him and the defendant. The plaintiff desires to have particularly adjudicated the effect of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- New Jersey Turnpike Authority v. ParsonsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1949
- A. Fink Sons v. GoldbergNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1927
- Weissbard v. Potter Drug Chemical Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1949
- Weissbard v. Potter Drug & Chemical Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1950
- Magna Mfg. v. Aetna Cas.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1941
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Jersey Central Power & Light Co. v. Local Unions 327, 749, 1289, 1298, 1303, 1309 & 1314 of the International Brotherhood of Electrical WorkersCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
- Silver Syndicate, Inc. v. Sunshine Mining Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1979
- Field Intelligence Inc v. Xylem Dewatering Solutions IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2022
- Doyle v. Northrop Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1978
- NJ Home Builders Ass'n v. Div. on Civil RightsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1963
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.