Legal Opinion
Weissbard v. Potter Drug Chemical Corp.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided November 29, 1949PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The plaintiffs instituted this proceeding under the Declaratory Judgments Act, R.S. 2:26-66 et seq., to declare a contract executed by the defendant pursuant to the provisions of the Fair Trade Act, R.S. 56:4-1 et seq., to be null and void, and to restrain the defendant from taking any proceeding against the plaintiffs.
The defendant has moved to dismiss the complaint on the ground that it is insufficient in law and fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.
These are the facts alleged in the complaint: The plaintiffs are the owners of retail drug stores in the City of Newark. The…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- James v. Alderton Dock Yards, Ltd.New York Court of Appeals · 1931
- New Jersey Bankers Ass'n v. Van RiperSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1948
- Empire Trust Co. v. Board of Commerce & NavigationSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1940
- Township of Ewing v. TrentonNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1945
- Lentheric, Inc. v. WeissbardNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1937
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Rosenberg v. D. Kaltman & Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1953
- N. C. Monroe Construction Co. v. Guilford County Board of EducationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- Sperry & Hutchinson Co. v. MargettsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1953
- Garnick v. SerewitchNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
- Finley v. Factory, Etc., Ins. Co. of AmericaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.