Legal Opinion

Metzler v. United States

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided September 20, 1993No. 92-72159PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

GADOLA, District Judge.

On May 3, 1993, plaintiffs filed the instant motion for summary judgment. Following an unsuccessful attempt by the parties to settle this matter, defendant filed its response August 5, 1993. Plaintiffs filed a reply September 7,1993. By informal agreement of the parties, and pursuant to Local Rule 7.1(e)(2) (E.D.Mich., Jan. 1, 1992), no oral argument was heard.

I. Facts

In October 1989, Maryland National Bank (“the Bank”) obtained a judgment for $7,115.66 against the plaintiffs’ son, Robert Metzler. The Bank thereafter…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. Marrese v. American Academy of Orthopaedic SurgeonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Lopez v. Union Carbide Corp.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2000
  2. Fischre v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1994
  3. Mecosta County Medical Center v. Metropolitan Group PropertyMichigan Supreme Court · 2022
  4. Mecosta County Medical Center v. Metropolitan Group PropertyMichigan Supreme Court · 2022
  5. Mecosta County Medical Center v. Metropolitan Group PropertyMichigan Supreme Court · 2022

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API