Rapoport v. Schneider
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtBreitel, J.
Plaintiffs, in their status both as directors and stockholders, brought this derivative action on behalf of the corporation against other directors to prevent the allegedly improper payment of a duplicate claim for real estate commissions and for an accounting. Plaintiffs appeal from the dismissal of the first cause of action alleged in their status as directors. The issues are the invalidity of the resolution authorizing payment of the claim for lack of proper notice and the conflict of interest of some directors who voted for it, and the sufficiency of facts alleged to charge the directors…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Brinckerhoff v. . BostwickNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
- Leslie v. . LorillardNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
- Bosworth v. . AllenNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
- General Rubber Co. v. . BenedictNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
- People v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United StatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- Goldberg v. MeridorCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
- Klein v. TabatchnickCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
- Espinosa v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1981
- Pereira v. Centel Corp. (In Re Argo Communications Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1991
- Index Fund, Inc. v. HagopianDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1976
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.