Legal Opinion

Hart v. Carpenter

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 24, 1877PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal in Chancery from Lapeer Circuit.

1Opinion of the Court

Cooley, Ch. J:

This is a. foreclosure suit, based upon a purchase money mortgage. The bill did not waive an answer on oath, and the mortgagor answered, admitting the mortgage, but setting *403up various defenses, the chief of which were, that he received from the mortgagee a warranty deed of the lands, the covenants in which were broken by the existence of paramount outstanding titles to a portion of the land, and that under the advice of the mortgagee he had paid fifteen hundred dollars to one adverse claimant, which should be applied on the mortgage. Also that one parcel of land was twice…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Twiss v. GeorgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1876
  2. Kimball v. KimballMichigan Supreme Court · 1867
  3. Wright v. WilsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1868
  4. Roberts v. MilesMichigan Supreme Court · 1864
  5. Van Dyke v. DavisMichigan Supreme Court · 1851

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lorimer v. LorimerMichigan Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Huyck v. BaileyMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Harmon v. DartMichigan Supreme Court · 1877

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API