Harmon v. Dart
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Ingham. Assumpsit. The facts are in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtGraves, J.
Plaintiff is widow and administratrix of Walter Harmon, who some time before his death left with the law firm of “Dart & Wiley” certain securities for collection. Nothing was collected in» his lifetime, but after his death the firm received $965.23. Mr. Dart is the survivor of the firm, Mr. Wiley having died some time since. Mrs. Harmon brought this suit on the common counts to recover the money collected.
*54. The action was tried before a jury, who returned a verdict in her favor for $45. Being dissatisfied with this result she alleges that the court erred in ruling at the trial, and prays a…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Kimball v. KimballMichigan Supreme Court · 1867
- Cook v. StevensonMichigan Supreme Court · 1874
- Mundy v. FosterMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
- Hart v. CarpenterMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
3Cited by2 opinions
- Lorimer v. LorimerMichigan Supreme Court · 1900
- Downey v. AndrusMichigan Supreme Court · 1880