Legal Opinion

Jones v. Fearnow

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 8, 1916PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error from District Court, Kay County; Wm. M. Bowles, Judge. Action by Emily F. Fearnow and others against Luttie B. Jones and others. Judgment for plaintiffs; and defendants bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtKane, C. J.

This was a suit in equity, commenced by all of the defendants in error, plaintiffs below, except the Phoenix Mutual Life Insurance Company, a corporation, against the plaintiffs in error, defendants below, for the purpose of declaring a resulting trust. The defendant in error the Phoenix Mutual. Life Insurance Company was the holder of a mortgage on the land involved, executed by the plaintiff in error Luttie B. Jones, and was joined with her as a party defendant in the trial court.

This is the third time the cause has been before this court, one phase of it having been considered in Fearnow…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ross v. StewartSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  2. Fearnow v. JonesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  3. Fast v. WalcottSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  4. Jones v. FearnowSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  5. Watt v. AmosSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1904

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Colbert v. PattersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  2. Higgins v. WatersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  3. Hill v. BurnettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API