Legal Opinion
Fidelity and Casualty Company of New York v. Frank
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided February 18, 1963No. Civ. 8370, 8361, 8407, 8406, 8365PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ANDERSON, Chief Judge.
The various Insurance Companies, who are parties in these actions, wish to use in evidence the whole or portions of reports made to the Civil Aeronautics Board by its investigative groups or sub-committees arising out of the investigation by the sub-committees of different aspects of the airplane crash in which Frank was killed. Mrs. Frank argues that the final reports of the C.A.B. are basically a compilation of the reports of the investigative groups made to the Board and, because the statute, 49 U.S.C. § 1441(e), prohibits the use in evidence of the C.A.B. report, or…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Palmer v. HoffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Pekelis v. Transcontinental & Western Air, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1951
- Moran v. Pittsburgh-Des Moines Steel Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1950
- Lobel v. American Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1951
- Universal Airline, Inc. v. Eastern Air Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1951
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Beech Aircraft Corp. v. HarveyAlaska Supreme Court · 1976
- Fidelity and Casualty Company of New York v. FrankDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1964
- Charles F. Krause, Administrator, Etc. v. Lucien Andre ChartierCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1969
- Falk v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1971
- In Re Air Crash at Charlotte, Nc on July 2, 1994District Court, D. South Carolina · 1996
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.