Legal Opinion
Fidelity and Casualty Company of New York v. Frank
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided March 23, 1964No. 8370, 8361, 8407, 8406, 8365PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ANDERSON, Chief Judge.
This ruling is supplemental to the memorandum on the same evidential question dated and filed February 18, 1963 and reported in D.C., 214 F.Supp. 803.
The issue revolves around the use of investigative group, reports made by subcommittees of the Civil Aeronautics Board and incorporated in whole 'or in part in- the report of the Civil Aeronautics Board itselfl The former ruling held that, while 49 U.S.C. § 1441(e) prohibits the use in evidence of the C.A.B. report or any part of it, this does not mean that the investigative group or sub-committee reports are, as such,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Marion J. Berguido, Individually v. Eastern Air Lines, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1963
- Fannie Israel and Mortimer H. Israel v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1957
- Fidelity and Casualty Company of New York v. FrankDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1963
3Cited by19 opinions
- American Airlines, Inc. v. United States of America and Sara Ann Creasy, Sara Ann Creasy v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- Keen v. Detroit Diesel AllisonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1978
- Beech Aircraft Corp. v. HarveyAlaska Supreme Court · 1976
- Murphy v. Colorado Aviation, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1978
- Lightenburger v. GordonNevada Supreme Court · 1965
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.