Legal Opinion
Falk v. United States
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided June 10, 1971No. Civ. No. 13207PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO COMPEL ANSWERS ON DEPOSITION AND DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO COMPEL ANSWERS TO INTERROGATORIES
BLUMENFELD, District Judge.
I
In this Tort Claims action against the federal government arising from the death of the plaintiff Marilyn Falk’s husband, Arthur L. Falk, plaintiffs have moved for an order pursuant to Rule 37, Fed.R.Civ.P., directing William H. Collins, an employee of the defendant, to answer certain opinion questions upon oral deposition examination which defendant’s counsel instructed the witness not to answer. Despite an earlier adverse ruling on this…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Marion J. Berguido, Individually v. Eastern Air Lines, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1963
- Universal Airline, Inc. v. Eastern Air Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1951
- Fidelity and Casualty Company of New York v. FrankDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1964
- McFadden v. Avco CorporationDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 1967
- Fidelity and Casualty Company of New York v. FrankDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1963
3Cited by4 opinions
- Spaulding v. DentonDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1975
- McCandless v. Beech Aircraft Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
- United States v. WhiteDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 1986
- Mccandless v. Beech Aircraft CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983