Legal Opinion

Mueller v. Mizia

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 3, 1967PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHeffernan, J.

Was the sale confirmed?

Much of appellant Mueller’s argument is directed to a state of facts that does not exist. It would serve little purpose to clutter this opinion with a litany of his misconceptions. Suffice it to say that one premise upon which he bases his case — that the sale in question was confirmed and that the court set aside a confirmed sale— is without foundation in the record. The detailed study that this court has given to the record shows absolutely no order confirming the sale to Mueller. Rather, each of the judge’s several orders restrains the receiver from issuing a deed…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bautz v. AdamsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Wintersberger v. Pioneer Iron & Metal Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Medlock v. SchmidtWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Barnard v. CoatesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Miles Homes, Inc. v. StarrettWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. State v. FishnickWisconsin Supreme Court · 1985
  2. State v. HornWisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Chevron Chemical Co. v. Deloitte & ToucheWisconsin Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Home Bank v. BeckerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Schauer v. DeNeveu Homeowner's Ass'nWisconsin Supreme Court · 1995

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API