Legal Opinion

Medlock v. Schmidt

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 30, 1965PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHeffernan, J.

“When I use a word, it means just what I choose it to mean — neither more nor less.”

Humpty Dumpty in

Alice in Wonderland,

Lewis Carroll

We agree with the decision of the learned trial judge, but conclude that the pardon document may on its face be construed to provide for a maximum sentence of thirty years.

The appellant in his brief and in oral argument placed great emphasis on the fact that the sentences of three to ten years for assault and robbery, and three to thirty years for assault and armed robbery, were by the document of commutation directed to be served concurrently with the sentence…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. P. Lorillard Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Wintersberger v. Pioneer Iron & Metal Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Application of McDonaldWisconsin Supreme Court · 1922
  4. State v. Joe Must Go Club of Wisconsin, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1955

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. County of Milwaukee v. State, Labor & Industry Review CommissionCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1983
  2. Brinklow v. RivelandSupreme Court of Colorado · 1989
  3. State Ex Rel. General Motors Corp. v. City of Oak CreekWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Delap v. Institute of America, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
  5. State v. BagnallWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API