Legal Opinion

State v. Dugan

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided July 2, 1999No. 22376-7-IIPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSeinfeld, J.

Cowlitz County Deputy Prosecutor Christopher T. Mahre appeals from a summary order of contempt. The trial court sanctioned him for asking a criminal defendant a question that, according to the trial judge, was “irrelevant, scandalous, and inflammatory.” Because a trial court may impose a summary contempt sanction pursuant to RCW 7.21.050 only for conduct constituting contempt under RCW 7.21.010, such as violating a court order or behaving in a disorderly, contemptuous, or insolent manner that tends to disrupt or interrupt the proceedings so severely as to warrant immediate sanction, and…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Harris v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. State v. PowellWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  3. United States v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. State v. PostWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul, & Pacific Railroad v. Washington State Human Rights CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1976

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
  2. State v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
  3. In re the Marriage of WallaceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
  4. State v. PeralaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
  5. State v. JordanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API