State v. Dugan
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtSeinfeld, J.
Cowlitz County Deputy Prosecutor Christopher T. Mahre appeals from a summary order of contempt. The trial court sanctioned him for asking a criminal defendant a question that, according to the trial judge, was “irrelevant, scandalous, and inflammatory.” Because a trial court may impose a summary contempt sanction pursuant to RCW 7.21.050 only for conduct constituting contempt under RCW 7.21.010, such as violating a court order or behaving in a disorderly, contemptuous, or insolent manner that tends to disrupt or interrupt the proceedings so severely as to warrant immediate sanction, and…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Harris v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- State v. PowellWashington Supreme Court · 1995
- United States v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- State v. PostWashington Supreme Court · 1992
- Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul, & Pacific Railroad v. Washington State Human Rights CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1976
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
- State v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
- In re the Marriage of WallaceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
- State v. PeralaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
- State v. JordanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.