Legal Opinion
State v. Perala
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided March 16, 2006No. Nos. 23151-8-III; 23149-6-III; 23150-0-III; 23152-6-III; 23153-4-III; 23154-2-III; 23155-1-III; 23157-7-III; 23158-5-III; 23159-3-III; 23161-5-III; 23162-3-III; 23166-6-III; 23167-4-III; 23168-2-III; 23169-1-III; 23170-4-III; 23171-2-III; 23348-1-III; 23440-1-III; 23441-0-III; 23442-8-III; 23443-6-III; 23445-2-IIIPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Thompson, J.*
¶1 This case is consolidated from over 20 different actions brought by the State and Grant County (hereinafter referred to as the State). However, the allegations of error in these multiple actions all hinge on resolution of the same issues. The State in each case challenges the failure of the Grant County Superior Court judges to recuse themselves and the judges’ subsequent decisions regarding compensation for court appointed counsel. The State first alleges that the trial courts abused their discretion in denying the State’s motions for recusal of all Grant County Superior…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- State v. PostWashington Supreme Court · 1992
- In Re the Salary of the Juvenile DirectorWashington Supreme Court · 1976
- Sherman v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1995
- Sherman v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1995
- Kreidler v. EikenberryWashington Supreme Court · 1989
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. RaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
- State v. RaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
- State v. SchernerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
- State v. PeralaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
- State v. Aradon (In re A.E.T.H.)Court of Appeals of Washington · 2019
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.