Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Stinnett

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 19, 1986No. 1903PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KELLY, Judge:

This case involves a direct appeal from judgment of sentence imposed upon the appellant, Reginald Stinnett, following a conviction in a jury trial for robbery. We find no merit in the appeal and accordingly affirm the judgment of sentence.

On the evening of February 5, 1981, Officer Edward Cottrell and three other officers of the Philadelphia Police Department were assigned to conduct a decoy operation in the area of Broad and Tasker Streets in South Philadelphia. 1 Officer Cottrell acted as the decoy and was dressed as a semi-derelict. Three police officers dressed in street…

2Cases cited50 opinions

  1. Yick Wo v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Loving v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Dunn v. BlumsteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Shelley v. KraemerSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  5. Gardner v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. MarinelliSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  2. Commonwealth v. TrillSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  3. Commonwealth v. GroveSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  4. State v. BlendenMississippi Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Commonwealth v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API