Legal Opinion

Brown v. Jerome

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 21, 1924No. 4170PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern Division of the Northern District of California; Maurice T. Dooling, Judge. Suit in equity by James Jerome against James Crosby Brown, of Brown Bros. & Co., and others, doing business under the designation of the “United States Lloyds.” Decree for complainant, and defendants appeal. On March 16, 1916, the California South Sea Navigation Company chartered from the owner thereof the steamer Roanoke.

Read the full summary

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern Division of the Northern District of California; Maurice T. Dooling, Judge. Suit in equity by James Jerome against James Crosby Brown, of Brown Bros. & Co., and others, doing business under the designation of the “United States Lloyds.” Decree for complainant, and defendants appeal. On March 16, 1916, the California South Sea Navigation Company chartered from the owner thereof the steamer Roanoke. On April 28, 1916, the Navigation Company entered into a contract with the Selby Smelting Company for the carriage by the Roanoke…

1Opinion of the CourtGilbert, Circuit Judge

(after stating the facts as above). [1] The appellants contend that the first covering note and the policy is-sued thereupon insured only freight earned on the southward voyage of the Roanoke plus that part of the return voyage from Valparaiso *3to Antofagasta, and not freight to be earned on the return voyage from Antofagasta to San Francisco. We do not so read the contract. The terms of the covering note and the policy mean, we think, in the light of the circumstances, that the intention was to insure only the freight to be earned on the return voyage from Antofagasta. The Navigation Company…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Sanders v. Pottlitzer Bros. Fruit Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1894
  2. Ætna Ins. v. Sacramento-Stockton S. S. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1921
  3. Moores v. Louisville UnderwritersUnited States Circuit Court · 1882
  4. Western Roofing Tile Co. v. JonesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  5. Northwestern Lumber Co. v. Grays Harbor & P. S. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1915

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Rennie & Laughlin, Inc., a Corporation v. Chrysler Corporation, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
  2. Glens Falls Insurance v. LongSupreme Court of Virginia · 1953
  3. Watson v. Providence Washington Ins. Co.District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1952
  4. Quiñones Jiménez v. Great American InsuranceSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1969
  5. Battin v. Merchants State BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1926

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API