Legal Opinion · Dissent

Battin v. Merchants State Bank

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided April 6, 1926Published

1DissentMorliNg, J.

(dissenting.) — It is undisputed that the plaintiff and his deceased wife on the day of their marriage arrived at an agreement. Whether the agreement became a contract or not depends on the question whether, at the time their minds met (not the time when the writing was signed), the marriage ceremony had been performed. If, before the minds of the parties met in agreement, they had become husband and wife, then there was no contract, not because of the statute of frauds, but because they were legally incapacitated to contract with reference to the subject-matter. The statute reads (Section…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Beckwith v. TalbotSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Flegel v. DowlingOregon Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Tobias v. LynchAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1920
  4. Anderson v. BestSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1896
  5. Tallman v. . FranklinNew York Court of Appeals · 1856

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API