Legal Opinion
M-J-K
Board of Immigration Appeals
Decided July 1, 2016No. ID 3866PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Cite as
26 I&N Dec. 773
(BIA 2016) Interim Decision #3866 Matter of M-J-K-, Respondent Decided June 29, 2016 U.S. Department of Justice Executive Office for Immigration Review Board of Immigration Appeals In cases involving issues of mental competency, an Immigration Judge has the discretion to select and implement appropriate safeguards, which the Board of Immigration Appeals reviews de novo. FOR RESPONDENT: Megan E. Hall, Esquire, Westminster, Colorado FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY: Kerri Calcador, Senior Attorney BEFORE: Board Panel: NEAL, Chairman; GREER, Board Member; O’HERRON,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- HASHMIBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2009
- Kennard Davis v. James WalkerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- M-A-MBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2011
- Jean Ridore v. Eric H. Holder Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- G-G-SBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2014
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Julio Benedicto v. Merrick GarlandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
- Reid v. GarlandCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2024
- W-A-F-CBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2016
- C-L-RBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2026
- Fremont v. BarrCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2020
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.