Legal Opinion

Fremont v. Barr

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided August 20, 2020No. 19-369Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

19-369 Fremont v. Barr BIA Connelly, IJ A078 370 967 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT SUMMARY ORDER RULINGS BY SUMMARY ORDER DO NOT HAVE PRECEDENTIAL EFFECT. CITATION TO A SUMMARY ORDER FILED ON OR AFTER JANUARY 1, 2007, IS PERMITTED AND IS GOVERNED BY FEDERAL RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 32.1 AND THIS COURT=S LOCAL RULE 32.1.1. WHEN CITING A SUMMARY ORDER IN A DOCUMENT FILED WITH THIS COURT, A PARTY MUST CITE EITHER THE FEDERAL APPENDIX OR AN ELECTRONIC DATABASE (WITH THE NOTATION “SUMMARY ORDER”). A PARTY CITING TO A SUMMARY ORDER MUST SERVE A COPY OF IT ON ANY PARTY NOT…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Yueqing Zhang v. Alberto Gonzales, United States Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
  2. Nadarjh Ramsameachire v. John Ashcroft, United States Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
  3. Jigme Wangchuck v. Department of Homeland Security, Immigration & Customs EnforcementCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
  4. Nijhawan v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  5. Weng v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API