People v. Mueller
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of. the court.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
The defendant was convicted of an unlawful sale of alcoholic liquors in a district which had been declared “no-license territory,” under the provisions of the act generally known as the “Wyllie law.” (Stats. 1911, p. 599.) His appeal is from the judgment of conviction and from an order denying a new trial.
Specifically, the charge against him was that he “did willfully and unlawfully sell alcoholic liquor, to wit: wine, 'to one Sam Stephens, within no-license territory, to wit: in the city of Red Bluff, in said county (Tehama), said wine not having been manufactured on the premises where the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Heintz v. CooperCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- People v. GrillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- People v. LewandowskiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- People v. WittyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- People v. ReillyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Lewinsohn v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1921
- People v. DeibertCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- People v. CahanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- People v. HayesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
- People v. StricklerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.