Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Matter of Dougherty

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided March 17, 1992No. C8-91-1134PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

482 N.W.2d 485 (1992)

In the Matter of the Amended Administrative Penalty Order Issued to Paul S. DOUGHERTY, III for Metal Coating Company and MCM Industries, Incorporated.

No. C8-91-1134.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

March 17, 1992.

Review Denied June 10, 1992.

Thomas D. Jenson, Duncan McCampbell, Lind, Jenson & Sullivan, P.A., Minneapolis, for relator.

Hubert H. Humphrey, III, Atty. Gen., Keith S. Moheban, Special Asst. Atty. Gen., St. Paul, for respondent.

Considered and decided by NORTON, P.J., and RANDALL, and CRIPPEN, JJ.

OPINION

CRIPPEN, Judge.

Relators, MCM Industries Incorporated and Paul S.…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Morissette v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  2. United States v. DotterweichSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. United States v. BalintSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  4. The State of New York v. Shore Realty Corp. And Donald LeograndeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
  5. United States v. ParkSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Reed v. ReidIndiana Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Ventres v. Goodspeed Airport, LLCSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
  3. In re Fresenius Granuflo/Naturalyte Dialysate Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2015
  4. Celentano v. RocqueSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
  5. BEC Corp. v. Department of Environmental ProtectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API