Paul v. McPhee Electrical Contractors
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
*19 Opinion
KOLETSKY, J.
The defendant appeals from the judgment of the trial court granting the apportionment defendants’ motion to strike the apportionment complaint. On appeal, the defendant claims that the trial court improperly held that (1) pursuant to General Statutes § 52-1021),1 a defendant sued in negligence could not implead apportionment defendants under a product liability theory, and (2) pursuant to the Product Liability Act, General Statutes § 52-572m et seq., the defendant was not a “product seller” and thus the defendant had no right to implead third party defendants for…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Daily v. New Britain Machine Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- Johnson v. MansonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Winslow v. Lewis-Shepard, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Rodia v. Tesco Corp.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1987
- Commissioner of Administrative Services v. GeraceConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Allard v. Liberty Oil Equipment Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- Ferrucci v. Atlantic City Showboat, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1999
- Fernandez v. Fusco Corporation, No. Cv98 006 14 75 (Sep. 3, 1999)Connecticut Superior Court · 1999
- Adams v. Champagne, No. Cv98-061154 (May 20, 1998)Connecticut Superior Court · 1998
- Fitzgerald v. Landscape Structures, Inc., No. 060923 (Nov. 14, 2000)Connecticut Superior Court · 2000
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.