Legal Opinion · Dissent

Fox Holdings, Inc. v. Wheatly Oil Co.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided November 4, 2003No. COA01-183Published

1Dissent

EAGLES, Chief

Judge, dissenting.

I respectfully dissent. In light of this Court’s decision in Bishop v. Lattimore, 137 N.C. App. 339, 530 S.E.2d 554 (2000), I vote to affirm the trial court.

To determine whether an action is removable as a matter of right to the county where the land is situated

[t]he test is this: If the judgment to which plaintiff would be entitled upon the allegations of the complaint will affect the title to land, the action is local and must be tried in the county where the land lies unless defendant waives the proper venue; otherwise, the action is transitory and must be…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In Re the Appeal From the Civil PenaltySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
  2. Rose's Stores, Inc. v. Tarrytown Center, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  3. Thompson v. HorrellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  4. Snow v. YatesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
  5. Wise v. IsenhourCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API