Legal Opinion

Young v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided March 6, 1923No. 24,163PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

■ Travis, C. J.

Appellant was charged by affidavit with having unlawfully had carnal knowledge of a female child under sixteen years of age, and from the judgment upon the verdict of the jury he appeals, and assigns as error; that the court erred in overruling his motion for a new trial, for the reason that the verdict of the jury is not sustained by sufficient evidence, and is contrary to law; in overruling his motion to quash the affidavit, and the motion in arrest.

Because appellant has not supported his assigned errors upon the overruling of his motions to quash the affidavit and in arrest,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Barker v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Barker v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Berry v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Flinn v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1919

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Brown v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Knapp v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Hartman v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API